Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
Well that shows what happens when you interpret things rather than take what people say at face value.
I am not jumping on anyone, Jakke. I am having a discussion about the inevitability of HTML5 killing flash within 10 years. I find it interesting that people really think it won't.
I cannot see anyone here who is saying this assertion is wrong coming up with a reason why something that costs money (flash) will beat something that doesn't (html5).
Anyone care to make a suggestion?
|
Within 10 years, maybe. BUT.. from your earlier posts I got the impression you were talking about months, maybe hours.
Anyhow.. anyone care to make a suggestion? Maybe if the browser developers would care to find a harmony and decide how and what codecs they'd support, since w3 doesn't. Some are free, some are not.
Also from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5
Quote:
|
Ian Hickson, editor of the HTML5 specification, expects the specification to reach the W3C Candidate Recommendation stage during 2012, and W3C Recommendation in the year 2022 or later.[9] However, many parts of the specification are stable and may be implemented in products:
|
Also read worthy:
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2010/...-html-5-video/
</end being an asshole>
Gonna go play hockey. Have fun arguing. I'll join back up later.