Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
Gideon, I just don't know why you argue with these people. Kane here makes a brilliant point and it all is based on making a profit off the licensed material.
I just literally don't know how you can do it. You're arguing with people who's "points" directly contradict what they are saying. It's...Uhg, I just can't even begin to understand why you bother with it. Kane's post should be a prime example of someone arguing with you on a point they don't understand as his posts directly conflict the legal definition of fair use. How can you possibly debate something with people who literally can't even comprehend what they are debating.
You are arguing with a brick wall. Plain and simple.
|
Wow!! you could not have missed the point of what Kane said by a larger margin
lemme try and 'splain to you
-(torrents/tubes/fileshares/forums) make cash from their own advertising being displayed around (some or a lot) stolen products
- giddyboy sez "but its INDIRECT profitz - so itz aok"
-Kane says "how about if I did (the above), would that be ok then too?" (ie posed a hypothetical parallel to see what giddyboy would think of it)
-you come in
(if you were being sarcastic I take back the 'splainin)
__________________
believe me - without free porn, just as many people will seek porn out on the Internet, and many more will pay if there is no free alternative, its not like sex is a fad - it can be milked much like any renewable resource - long term
i wasn't born with enough middle fingers
- Marilyn Manson