Quote:
Originally posted by Brujah
Blow it out your own ass. Your list is meaningless in any real sense except to give you the opportunity to label competitors as lawbreakers. It's one thing to suggest that content providers be informed. It's something else altogether to make a list and suggest that customers not purchase from those on the list labeled as breaking the law. In reality, if a customer is concerned about his content providers.. he should take it up with them and his own attorney. He should do that even for those you have labeled as compliant, because trusting that list to determine who is compliant would be a big mistake.
|
Notice that the list also shows providers who are not required to be compliant? If my intent was to show those who are breaking the law then why would I bother to list those who clearly are not breaking it? Also, why would I offer to update the listing once they were compliant instead of just saying "As of the date of this publication, the following companies appear to not be in compliance with 2257?"
This list was posted as a reality check for the industry. I was not even aware of how many people were not compliant until I started updating the 2257 pages of our sites. The shit I found alarmed me and I decided to make a post about it so that others can be more aware.
Sorry that some of you think there were other motives...Actually...No, I am not sorry. Why should I appologize for trying to help? Fuck em if they are too blinded by their anger to fix their oversight.