Quote:
Originally posted by Brujah
I do agree that it isn't a difficult issue to be in compliant with. Even if the interpretation is to the extreme, it probably can't hurt except in the case of the amateurs who are being advised they need to put their real names, and home addresses on their website in an easy to find location. My issue earlier about the information being inaccurate was simply to say that thinking someone is compliant because they appear to be doesn't necessarily mean that they are.
|
Perhaps we can get Aaron to reword it to "Appears compliant" or something. As it'd be impossible to actually verify 100% compliance without inspecting every record exists on top of what's listed.
I do see the difficulty that amateurs face, but honestly, it isn't a new law, it isn't a new regulation and it should have been something they knew they'd have to face going into it. Some people are running around like chickens with their heads cut off, this evil 2257 thing came out of nowhere, oh my! Well, it didn't. Sometimes a wakeup call is a good thing for an entire industry.