View Single Post
Old 12-07-2009, 10:32 AM  
candyflip
Carpe Visio
 
candyflip's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 43,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty D View Post
Cybersquatting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Cybersquatting (also known as domain squatting), according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price.

The term is derived from "squatting," which is the act of occupying an abandoned or unoccupied space or building that the squatter does not own, rent or otherwise have permission to use. Cybersquatting, however, is a bit different in that the domain names that are being "squatted" are (sometimes but not always) being paid for through the registration process by the cybersquatters. Cybersquatters usually ask for prices far greater than that at which they purchased it. Some cybersquatters put up derogatory remarks about the person or company the domain is meant to represent in an effort to encourage the subject to buy the domain from them.[citation needed] Others post paid links via Google, Yahoo, Ask.com and other paid advertising networks to the actual site that the user likely wanted, thus monetizing their squatting. As with many controversial issues, some argue that the dividing line of cybersquatting is difficult to draw, or that the practice is consistent with a capitalistic and free market ethos.

Cybersquatting is one of the most loosely used terms related to domain name intellectual property law and is often incorrectly used to refer to the sale or purchase of generic domain names.

---

Otherwise known as a Shady Shoehorn - lol
Your reading comprehension isn't that great. Your own example specifically describes monetizing a "cyber-squatted" domain by placing ads to the various networks you listed.

That has absolutely nothing to do with what Shoehorn did, no matter how much you want to believe you're right. You're failing even when it comes to defending what you're trying to do here.
__________________

Spend you some brain.
Email Me
candyflip is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote