49thParallel

No, 12-Clicks....you I am still going full steam ahead with.

All of the information you quoted above was in response to Candidclicks...he wanted to play the game, so I took a look at his program. (Notice that his response was quoted at the start of my reply). But, his program just plays the standard games...not the tricks that your program plays. Now, if you had quoted the next post, which starts, a) Click on the SI link...
then you would be on the right track. But don't worry, my little bunky...when the whole entire thread above (except for the one post you quoted) is about your company...it's easy to see how you would make such a simple mistake.

12-Clicks, as a parting comment...I have mentioned this to you so many times before....you must move on past your "one trick pony" responses. I swear, EVERY single thread I can find in which you TRY to take a swing at someone ends like this...

"go back to your real job"
"do you want fries with that"
"put on your paper hat"
..little laughing head

But alas, I should depart - (because of my need to get ready for my "real job", no doubt) - but if you really want to quote me....why don't you quote the parts of the thread above which outline (in detail) the damage which I have shown originated from a SI link. Sooner or later, at least a few members of this board will notice that your responses are based on deflection...and not addressing the real issues at hand.

As a recap, if your system has been comprimised by the actions of a system like SI, please visit:

www.ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.htm

And for a more detailed description of this exploit, go to:
http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/AutoSearch.html

Take note of this author's research which shows that the exploit that he discovered also returned a Standard Internet domain, www.tunders.com -


Quote:
When the wiseman points his finger, 12-clicks has long since left the building