Quote:
Originally Posted by nation-x
yeah... because the IPCC is entirely made up of people from that university... *sarcasm*
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1_home.html
Let me use your logic and debunk all of your "conservative" scams... shall I?
You demonstrate that you don't know anything about scientists or science in general. Whenever someone publishes a paper on a particular subject the scientists that are working on that particular subject work to disprove it. This group above does not possess the only raw data in the world... all this article shows is that this particular university published results but didn't keep the raw data to validate the results against. They are not the only university studying this issue and do not hold the key to the universe of climate change science. Only in the world of idiocracy that you live in would this be the case. |
If you had even a passing familiarity with this issue you would know that the emails demonstrate that the peer review process had been politicized and that dissenting opinions and analyses were ignored and the dissenting scientists were blackballed. You would also know that the missing data from East Anglia was the primary basis for the recommendations made by the IPCC.
Of course you probably already know that are just trying to obfuscate the issue. With you I never know if you are being intentionally dishonest or are just stupid. Perhaps it is a combination of the both?
