Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
I seem to remember a case where a guy in Florida I believe was arressted for taking pictures of early teens in panties and other sexy "poses" and putting them on a membership site. They didnt show any skin that you wouldnt see with a bathing suit on. I don't think your analysis is correct.
|
Well as we know the government can arrest you for stuff, whether or not you are guilty is a different situation. We don't know what his charges where because technically it isnt porn, however it may be considered a "lude and lascivious" act on someone under the age of "x". so if you had the pictures maybe that isnt a crime. but whoever took them it maybe. who knows what the government thinks when it comes to this stuff. Half the problem with porn cases in general is when you are arrested for posting something "obscene". it questions the definition of what one considers to be "obscene" would you think a 18 year old bent over doggy style is with 3 dildos shoved in her considered obscene or would you jerk off to it. Its all government politics. If the girl where in panties but it possibly showed "camel toe" then the government has just cause, as explained to me by a prominent attorney in this business. if you can even see an outline of pussy lips through panties, then you would need proper 2257 docs. hence why on some byots they do not want to even see a "star" or blur across the genitals. tits are perfectly acceptable.
But to the topic at hand. i don't disagree with your concern on other countries and their possible laziness of the 2257. your best bet is if you do want to post it. seek proper legal council for it and let the lawyer deal with it. I feel asking for the papers is perfectly fine and they should have no problem providing to you if you want to see them. Its called customer satisfaction. if they want you to promote their stuff, they should gladly send all info. granted you may have a lot of info to receive but like you said. HOMIE DONT PLAY THAT.