Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
you're so fucking stupid and insane, its unreal.
YOU think its a bogus claim you stupid fucking dickhead.
And there is a process to sort that out - in a court of law. that process requires both parties to show up and participate in that. when you don't show up, there is only one side to be heard and that's the complaint. that is THE ONLY EVIDENCE THE JUDGE HAS and that is what his decision is based on. Good God you're a fucking retard.
almost any civil claim is bullshit, you sorry moron. the very purpose of filing civil suits in this country is to force a settlement... not go to trial.
you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about and you are 100% wrong.
so fuck you, fuck your moronic, misguided and totally wrong point by point rants and fuck your support of piracy
 |
bullshit the judge is not limited to the evidence that you presented only, he can consider any evidence or case law that he is aware of.
Quote:
|
In many jurisdictions, a party moving for summary judgment takes the risk that, although the judge may agree there are no material issues of fact remaining for trial, the judge may also find that it is the non-moving party who is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
|
if the law worked the way you think it does, if you could deliberately hide facts (like the existance of the higher court ruling) and judge was forced to only judge based on evidence that was presented even when he knows about the coverup. The entire legal system would fall apart.
what would be the point of precedents if they only applied if presented
the appeals process could go on forever dragging the case thru an infinite number of retrials because the defendent "forgot" one case.
You are the one who doesn't understand the principle of the court system.