Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
yeah but that the point
ip address should not be enought, using your analogy that is the equivalent of suing me for the damages to your car without the only evidence being that a traffic cam caught me speeding 3 blocks away.
you didn't get any proof that my car was damaged, you don't have witnesses, your ownly evidence is that i was close by.
i might have done it but you need to do a lot more digging before your allowed to win a summary judgement.
|
you have no clue how the courts work. no wonder your so baffled at all the laws and legal rulings and judgments.
since you dont seem to get it... let me once more try to help you. i'll consider it a public service.
when you don't go to court to argue your side... you have no argument. hence, the plaintiff goes for a summary judgment. that's it. that's where it starts and ends. you didn't show up to prove that there are no witnesses, evidence etc... and i showed up to claim that you did it, the complaint was formerly filed. you were then formally made aware of the complaint and proceedings against you (time, date, location, complaint, identity of plaintiff),.. i followed the letter of the law to bring it to this point and followed all procedure... and you, as the defendant, without good cause, elected not to partake in the process and where then judged and ruled against in absentia.
you seriously have no clue what you're talking about and you are a rambling idiot. personally, i'm a bit disappointed in myself for even taking the time to address you and would usually leave that to similar idiots like robbie since he seems to have no issue sinking to your level and wasting his time.
i however, think i'll take my own advice and leave you to continue to make an ass out of yourself before the few remaining people who don't think your an abject retard (should there be any left).