GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

jact · 04-25-2003, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sneaker
AaronM,

I believe this was an excellent attempt to bring light to 18US2257, but you obviously were not "backed by legal counsel" reason I know this is what attorney in thier right mind would ever advise you to POST a list like this. In my honest opinion you should remove it. Secondly there is no case law to effectively understand the law and how it would be enforced, to this extent who would want to "go down that path to find out?" Since we shoot some of our material in countries where "hardcore" porn is forbidden and also travel around to other countries we don't have to comply with 18USC2257. But since we sell to pussy magazines and also U.S. based customers we included / maintained all documentation and records in accordance with the law as advised by our attorney which we have been doing for over 10 years (most of those years to pussy magazines). And in each "zip" file was the proper 18USC2257 text file with the name of the person who is tasked as the custodian of record and address to his place of business. As for your list which we believe serves a good purpose just the wrong approach we have updated our site to point to the same text file that is in each zip file we send to our customers. As you can see in the post on 02/06/2003 use the link below we were asked about the same 18USC2257 by a potential customer and the user "Carrie" was nice enough to post the text file that was inside the content zip file so this is nothing new our customers have always been compliant and protection of not only ourselves but our customers has been our number one priority.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=105330 (close to bottom of first page.)

Anyways you should really remove the list or at least reword the list to cover your ass. IMHO

Case law for 2257. here

This was sent to me by
Lawrence Walters
Weston, Garrou & DeWitt
www.FirstAmendment.com
407.788.7337