Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicks
you understand that you linked to a lobbiest's webpage and not a governmental or journalistic one, right?
here's a more accurate website:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...010303617.html
odd how medical costs aren't mentioned once. 60% isn't something the washington post would miss.
so yeah. its simply a lie.
no it isn't. where did you get THAT fact, michele obama's official website? |
yea that's why i put the disclaimer. The link i put up is the national coalition of healthcare.
here is a link from another group:
http://www.pnhp.org/new_bankruptcy_s...uptcy-2009.pdf
These are doctors and groups that need facts in order to prove what they're talking about. If you're going to dismiss these out of hand, there is no further point on us talking about it. I asked you look this up yourself from sources that you can believe. These lobbyists, doctors, would stand to lose money if Socialized medicine was introduced wouldn't they? seems odd that they'd be trying to implement it.
no it was an opinion based on what i have heard about Canadas deficiet and action plan:
http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/eng/index.asp
London, UK action plan:
http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/economy/recovery/
Germany and France refusing for a global action plan and opting for independant action plans:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...el-g20-economy