Quote:
Originally Posted by TMM_John
If someone has something they'd like me to look at, I'm more than happy to. The times I have looked into things like this, there was no issue. Usually its an affiliate who has done 2 sales in a month and this month did 0 sales and is looking to blame the world for it.
If there is an issue, show us, and we'll fix it.
|
So pre NATS a system using ccbill - We had many many sales- NO chargebacks. Once the affiliate switched to NATS- we had the same sales- but every month the affiliate claims many chargebacks have come through- thus deducting usually 50% of the money we made...
Can you look into that!? How can we prove the chargebacks are warranted?
What questions or what verifyable information should we ask a sponsor to reveal to us- before we take them to small claims court?
Seems to me NATS gives thieving webmasters "too much" control.