Quote:
Originally posted by candidpublishinginc
Why don't you show us some "proof" that standard internet hijacks people's browsers. All you're doing is pointing the finger and not showing any proof. That might have been an SI affiliate that did this and not them directly.
It really doesn't make sense to me for them to hijack webmaster's browsers since you went to their affiliate page.
Lastly, McAffee really jumps the gun on these so called JS "exploits". Their determinations are more political than anything. They actually consider delay consoles "exploits" as well as dialers while Norton does not.
In short, I honestly don't buy what you're saying. If there was some sort of auto download exploit in the new IE it's likely that it would be exploited by many more people.
Also who made you the Internet Cop? Thanks to your FTC complaint I'm sure they're going to go after blind link programs in general. Thanks for making my job easier.
|
Have you read ANY of the above thread? I would suggest you read it all. That should explain a few things to you, and provides more then simply a smoking gun...
And the "alleged" culprit" link is the one that an affiliate uses with blind text to send consumers to Standard Internet online property...
And as far as the FTC goes, when a company's exploit causes mailicous damage to my system and other consumers' and businesses' systems, then the gloves are off.