Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisH
Did I say 2257 anywhere? please show me where I said anything about 2257 law here.
|
This is 100% about 2257. This is what Epoch requested:
"Please forward us your 2257 documentation for these models so that we can verify they were of legal age at the time of the shoot."
2257 is why we have to have IDs. NO OTHER REASON.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisH
She aparently "LOOKS" underage, that is why they ask. And yet you want to make the processor out to be the bad guy here? are you out of your fucking mind? (wait, I already answered that before, so dont need to repeat that)
|
Just curious, do you use Ibill for processing? You are striking me as the type who would.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisH
Then DWB want to "protect" the model by having the FBI verify the age. What do you think FBI does? if they got involved they would most likely contact the local government and ask them to verify her age.
|
No, I want Epoch to have to view the IDs in the same manner the FBI would, and yea, with someone from law with them. Dude, I don't give a FUCK if the FBI wants to see my records. Why would I? Unless you are hiding something, you shouldn't either. At least they could 100% verify the model is of age, while Epoch can not, as they would get a totally blacked out ID. It makes no sense at all and protects no one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisH
Do you think the model is more safe when the local government (where shooting porn is against the law) know the name and ID of a model shooting porn?
|
Ummm, yes. I do not fear US authorities when it comes to 2257. They can not and will not cause problems for me for shooting in countries where it is illegal to shoot.
You need to get a batter grasp of how things work, both with 2257, inspections and the law.
