Quote:
Originally Posted by andrej_NDC
Dude, you have no clue what the 2257 law is all about. The custodian of records is there for a reason.
|
Did I say 2257 anywhere? please show me where I said anything about 2257 law here.
It seem like you also have a problem getting through your thick head, that the processor need to see some sort of ID or documentation, that the model on the site he want proccessing for, is in fact over 18, since that are unable to judge by looks only.
She aparently "LOOKS" underage, that is why they ask. And yet you want to make the processor out to be the bad guy here? are you out of your fucking mind? (wait, I already answered that before, so dont need to repeat that)
Then DWB want to "protect" the model by having the FBI verify the age. What do you think FBI does? if they got involved they would most likely contact the local government and ask them to verify her age.
Do you think the model is more safe when the local government (where shooting porn is against the law) know the name and ID of a model shooting porn?
Since you are to fucking stupid to understand this, I doubt i can dumb the essence of this problem down even further, for your to have a chance to understand.