Quote:
Originally Posted by Deej
problem is epoch dosnt care about their profit loss with dwb and dwb dosnt care about his profit loss with epoch. so youre both willing to throw it away for policies and morals...
now which do you find more commendable... policy and profit or morals and safety of models.
I dont think for one second that epoch is going to endanger one of DWB's models, but thats not for me to risk. its for him...
|
Agreed.
I, unlike a lot of people in this thread, am in the
same boat as DWB. We both shoot content, and have to deal with 2257 as content producers.
That said, I simply prefer to pick my battles, and this is not one worth fighting, to me personally. However, DBW has his own motives, and business to run. I like DWB on a personal level, and I am not saying he is necessarily right or wrong. However, I simply do not see the point in all this.
When I sign up with a processor, I know they are little more than a middle man in the transaction process. We are in business together. I agree to their terms, just like they have to agree to the terms with their merchant bank, and their merchant bank with VISA.
I am essentially trusting them to not rip me, or my members, off. Trusting my members billing information with them. Trusting I will be paid for my memberships, and so forth. I am putting a lot of trust in them to remain IN business. If they had a question, like in this DWB case, I would just block out the non-essential (contact) info and show them whatever so I could get back to business. Not make a federal case about it, nor lose my rebills or effect my customers negatively over something like this.
But that's just me.