Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
To say Bush had 35 in 8 years and compare that with 31 in 8 months is not relevant.
I believe I did provide some reasons as to why those that are concentrating on the number of czars. 31 confidants that collect a check and have no one to answer to.
|
You have one channel you operate on, don't you? Here, let me try it again, so your hearing aid can pick it up:
I WAS NOT ARGUING THE POLITICS OF IT.
I WAS COMMENTING ON HOW THE WORD "CZAR" HAS BEEN KEYED ON IN THE EVOLUTION OF THIS PROTEST.
I FIND HOW IT'S BEEN USED INTERESTING FROM A PSYCHOLOGICAL STANDPOINT.
Geez, man. Lighten up for a sec, I'm
IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU on the "too many czars" and "poor choice of people" issues. You didn't catch that when I said it earlier, did you?
