Quote:
Originally Posted by Nautilus
Not fully relevant, but still a good precedent. With some effort it can be extended to our area of interest (copyright infringements), as most of the arguments that convinced the court in LV case will still be valid.
|
You can?t extend it to copyright they are two spate things and that is why it is beneficial as they can?t claim safe harbor, once a host or advertiser is put on notice of the mark infringement or even if they merely should have know about the infringement they are liable from that point forward they can?t wait for the Tube owner to take it down.