View Single Post
Old 04-17-2003, 10:49 PM  
kronic
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 964
Quote:
Originally posted by TheJimmy
Good post Aaron!

Thus my and a few other's previous sentiment on going overboard on protection & documentation even at the secondary producer level...

I have gone through all content and anything I don't have docs for is shitcanned...no amount of money is worth fucking up your future and forcible anal pillaging by the DOJ & company :/
"The secondary producer may also apparently comply by naming the primary producer in its Notice and there disclosing the name of his/her/its "natural person" records custodian and the place of business where the primary maintains records."

Would this statement not mean that you wouldn't have to have 2257 records on file and instead simply name as the custodian of records, the primary producer?

That's how it reads to me.
kronic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote