Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
really? they debate effective methods? seriously? all i hear is about what "CAN'T" or SHOULDN'T or SHOULDN'T HAVE been done. or what WAS over the line. All i hear is people bitching about water boarding and so on. all i hear are vicious accusations of horrible behavior and violations of human rights. i don't hear anything about solutions.
i've never heard anyone say "oh hey, this is the most effective way to extract time sensitive information from a suspect... which is why ALL these other methods are unnecessary"
i guessed i missed the part where all these viable and effective alternatives were offered up.
i just keep hearing a bunch of pussies bitch and moan about someones rights while they watch bombs in open air markets get detonated across the globe.
|
yes - as I said, have you been living under a rock?
Even the NY Times have published articels about the lack of result. Torture (or enhanced interrogation as I'm sure you want to call it) have not provided one single bit of usefull information.
Quite opposit. It have given a lot of "false negatives" or whatever you want to call it, when the prisoners (ohh, I forgot, they ar not prosoners - they are "detainees" because prisoners have rights) are forced to give out false information to stop the torture.
Even Dick Cheney had to admit, that the info they got from Abu Zubaydah was BEFORE the torture. Anything he said during the torture was bullshit and totally unusable information