Quote:
Originally Posted by TMM_John
How would you design the FHG listing if you could design it any way you wished?
|
John, v3 was superior in speed alone compared to 4. But for a quick dump capability, I defy anyone to come up with a better solution than the one Medium Pimpin implemented on v4 for FHG's. Fast, efficient, and vastly superior. It is certainly the exception on v4 rather than the rule.
NScash's own FHG system, while not on NATS4, is comparable if you're looking for examples of an efficient FHG system.
Quote:
|
(also, you shouldn't see any performance issues on v4, if you are, please let me know where you are seeing them)
|
I'd rather not throw any one company under the bus in public... but suffice it to say that I have yet to see a single v4 FHG system not make me sit and wait with each "display" versus how fast the results are returned on v3 versions -- regardless of the hardware it is installed on. One large company who recently reverted back to 3 has incredibly powerful servers and v4 still performed slower than any v3 install I have used. I was both relieved, and happy, they went back to 3.