Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
btw being it's Brazers whom owns many of these illegal tubes. Why doesn't someone sue them for unfair business practices? I'm sure it could be argued that they are trying to dilute their competitions content by giving it away for free on tubesites, causing their competition harm.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
my opinion is the exact opposite when you go after a dog of a case and lose you create a legal precedent that your opponents can use against you to further extend their rights.
|
This case was about unfair business practice, not the specific content. So the tube site has not "won" the "right" to use stolen content...
Giving a free content to intentionally harm competitors might actually have the opposite effect. Who wants to marketing a producer or sponsors who endorse or give away all free elsewhere anyway? Redtube + sponsors might be big, but if you sum up all, they do not run the show. What we need, is a list of which producers, sponsors, trades etc. to avoid - and which not to avoid; lets start with teenrevenue which deserves the marketing
