GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - whitehouse doesnt want to pay 1 citigroup employee 100m

PornMD · 07-28-2009, 03:19 PM

It sounds absolutely heinous when you say Citi wants to pay one of their employees $100 million. On the other hand, it sounds absolutely heinous when you say an employee made the company X amount of money and under contract was entitled to a percentage of it, and the White House is trying to stop him from being paid.

It's all about how things are worded. Ask someone if they owned a company, would they ever consider paying an employee $100 million and they'll probably say no. Ask someone if they owned a company and an employee was able to singlehandedly make them a billion dollars if they agreed to pay that employee 10% ($100 million) after the fact, would they ever consider paying that employee $100 million and they'll probably say yes (unless of course they're fucking braindead but who knows anymore).

07-28-2009, 03:19 PM
PornMD Mainstream Businessman Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 9,291	It sounds absolutely heinous when you say Citi wants to pay one of their employees $100 million. On the other hand, it sounds absolutely heinous when you say an employee made the company X amount of money and under contract was entitled to a percentage of it, and the White House is trying to stop him from being paid. It's all about how things are worded. Ask someone if they owned a company, would they ever consider paying an employee $100 million and they'll probably say no. Ask someone if they owned a company and an employee was able to singlehandedly make them a billion dollars if they agreed to pay that employee 10% ($100 million) after the fact, would they ever consider paying that employee $100 million and they'll probably say yes (unless of course they're fucking braindead but who knows anymore). __________________ Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.