I thought it was clear to begin with, but as one of my old communications profs used to say, you have to get it across to the
other person, that's why they call it
communication.
The
questionable paragraph has been revised, with bold copy added:
Quote:
|
"The lawsuit is an example of what is known as a SLAPP ["Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation"] suit," attorney Lawrence Walters ? who represents Internet hosting company Choopa.com and RedTube advertisers Bangbus.com, Generation Financial d/b/a Videosz.com, and Fling.com in the suit ? told XBIZ. "It's not allowed under California law, and the court recognized ? at least with respect to the advertisers ? that this is a SLAPP suit and granted our motion and dismissed the case against the advertisers based on SLAPP grounds. The next issue to be determined is the amount of attorneys fees owed to our clients."
|
Thanks for pointing this out.
--t