Quote:
Originally Posted by Shap
I respect him having the balls to try something unfortunately it wasn't well thought out or researched. I'm guessing he was given bad advice.
On a personal note I'm not very well educated in the legal arena. I do my homework and get as much information as possible but for the most part when it comes to legal situations I rely on my lawyers for guidance. I'm not sure if this was Kevin's idea that he shoved down his lawyer's throat or their idea that they shoved down his.
|
my opinion is the exact opposite when you go after a dog of a case and lose you create a legal precedent that your opponents can use against you to further extend their rights.
not researching this case before, blindly going in with this dog has now absolutely established the law on the side of the tube sites. IT means arguements that could have won are going to have overcome this ruling to get by, making it way worse for everyone.
this cheerleader mentality has to stop, cheering a guy on waste money on dog of a case like this is actually the worst thing you can do for your industry.