View Single Post
Old 07-26-2009, 09:17 PM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
If it was about the well being of the child, it should be child endangerment or whatever law prohibits people from doing danger to an unborn child.

The charge is obscenity and that's what should be judged. It's sad as a nation that we target free speech like this. Hopefully the ACLU or someone will take the case and win.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote