Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcb420
Funny you say $500 he is down. I thought you said you held up your end of the deal....
That sounds exactly like something a scammer or someone with something to hide would say.
|
I was waiting for Killswitch`s next comment on how mmcfadden had lost $500 because that would have been the next thing that he had got wrong. For the umpteenth time, he was partially refunded. Do you want me to post the refund confirmation or is that another lie from me?
Funny how all his mates jump onto the bandwagon on what a great guy he is.
I have explained at length (in one of the three threads that the buyer took it upon himself to make) on how the original script works, I pasted in the original stat screenshot that showed the visitors sent, I posted in numbers for the 15th + 16th, I cannot get raw logs because to use the server techs comment -"There is no way to pull logs from 30 days ago if it is rotated or deleted." and I have been responsive at all time to the buyer through email/ICQ.
I 100% agree that we took too long setting-up the new script but that was the reason why I wanted to compensate the buyer which is why I offered 40 k of extra clicks.
We did send him traffic and the traffic sources were the exact same from when the campaign started on the 23rd June through to the 16th July (the difference was during the first 4.7 k, they were sent through the sordidstats script, the remaining 13 k was not).
Does all this sound like a person who is trying to rip off the buyer? Of course it doesn`t.
Did the buyer become abusive telling me to "fuck-off" etc. Yes he did.
And no I won`t be sending him some traffic URL`s of publishers who we work with because he will post them here and I certainly don`t want sites included in what has gone on here - that would be totally unfair to those individuals.