Originally Posted by ottyhotties

I will say as a board of pornographers our first consideration should be given to her views of pornography before we discuss these other topics. As a center/right conservative and a pornographer I'm happy to see Sotamayer views expressed in Farrell v. Burke & Freeman. She is open to porn legislation and the typical statutory construction descriptions of pornography as being vague and overbroad. Even though she rules against the plaintiff (a parolee with limited rights) her views on porn are all something we can support and in line with how our lawyers in porn often attack porn legislation in courts.

http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...9.F3d.470.html