Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom
I've been watching the hearings cover to cover.. which means on cspan with no talking head interruptions. SO what are they claiming she spins? And by that I mean, what are the conservative talking heads claiming?
|
Oh yeah CNN is a bunch of conservative talking heads... panels with three liberals to one if that and when they do throw in a token conservative somehow CNN always finds conservatives (because they aren't conservatives) who can't even articulate mainstream conservative thought.
This selection doesn't move the court in any direction so I'll put no skin in this game. I will say as a board of pornographers our first consideration should be given to her views of pornography before we discuss these other topics. As a center/right conservative and a pornographer I'm happy to see Sotamayer views expressed in Farrell v. Burke & Freeman. She is open to porn legislation and the typical statutory construction descriptions of pornography as being vague and overbroad. Even though she rules against the plaintiff (a parolee with limited rights) her views on porn are all something we can support and in line with how our lawyers in porn often attack porn legislation in courts.
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...9.F3d.470.html