View Single Post
Old 04-13-2003, 12:51 AM  
jas1552
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of the free, home of the brave
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally posted by bhutocracy


I think Gore would have handled 9/11 fine, for a starters being "presidential" in a time of crisis is like shooting fish in a barrel (hell *OUR* prime ministers support went up 10-15% because of what happened in *YOUR* country.. at times of national crisis the people get behind their leaders), Clintons anti-terrorism proposals wouldn't have been scrapped and redrawn in partisan scent marking and would have already been implemented by 9/11 perhaps preventing it, and crushing Al-Queada in Afghanistan with the world's support isn't too much of a feat.

Iraq though.. yeah, that would have been handled differently.. Can't say better or worse though.
Oh yes Clintons anti terrorism policies worked wonders.

I do agree that any president would have done Afghanistan. I doubt however that Gore would have taken as a hard a line as Bush with the "You're either with us or against us." stuff. We'll never know of course but on Iraq I think he would have continued Clinton's all talk no action policy.
jas1552 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote