Quote:
Originally Posted by gwidomains
Clearly you didn't read the whole USA Today piece -- or got it from a second hand source that buried the info:
"Much of [the money] has followed a well-worn path to places that regularly collect a bigger share of federal grants and contracts, guided by formulas that have been in place for decades and leave little room for manipulation?The imbalance didn?t start with the stimulus. From 2005 through 2007, the counties that later voted for Obama collected about 50% more government aid than those that supported McCain, according to spending reports from the U.S. Census Bureau."
Another money quote
"Investigators who track the stimulus are skeptical that political considerations could be at work. The imbalance is so pronounced ? and the aid so far from complete ? that it would be almost inconceivable for it to be the result of political tinkering, says Adam Hughes, the director of federal fiscal policy for the non-profit OMB Watch. "Even if they wanted to, I don't think the administration has enough people in place yet to actually do that," he says"
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...-redblue_N.htm
And everyone industry votes for hand-outs as well why do you think lobbyists and banksters are so well paid.
LOL.
|
right on the money

"And everyone industry votes for hand-outs as well why do you think lobbyists and banksters are so well paid."