Quote:
Originally Posted by joshgirls
thank you to those that are giving good feedback.
at this point, i have no reputation. so i can understand how CCBill gives affiliates assurance they will get their cut. But credibility is something i need to build in any event. I'd prefer using a program upfront that best services my affiliate network, & is able to grow with my business. I have heard feedback that NATS is the best & CCBill is not suited for big programs. Is it true CCBill is not suited for big business? My goal is to succeed not to fail so i dont want an affiliate backend thats limited to newbs.
my consigliere says i should do CCBill because its cheaper, simpler & affiliates trust them. But NATS seems to provide more flexibility & stats. I would strongly prefer learning & mastering 1 program & grow with it as opposed to one day finding I am outgrowing CCBill & then i have endure a conversion that im certain will not be seamless.
Please give me more food for thought! Thank you.
|
my program puts most so called big programs to shame volume wise and I have been using ccbill epoch for almost a decade without nats
there is no doubt that without nats you will be missing out on many affiliates and you wont have proper control over billing, but everyone needs to start somewhere, so my advice is (as many people here already said) start with ccbill or epoch or both tweak your program get some affiliates and then decide.
I am starting a new program within 2 weeks that will use nats but its much of my same content but simply separate so old affiliates dont have to change anything and I can run those sites separate.
As far as cutting checks, nats now has webmasterchecks.com built in meaning you just export it all to them and let them do the work, so far I only read positive about them.