Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfy
The word "insinuated" is what makes you and everyone who agrees with you on this subject a tool. What you believe he is "insinuating" is simply your take on the words, or rather - your "spin" on it. Since he didn't actually say that, you are putting words in his mouth. Rather... you're giving an opinion based on your beliefs, and not facts... whch is exactly what Glenn Beck does. When you spin something that is apparently being spun, aren't you double spun?
Regardless of how you feel about Glen Beck, the posts in this thread are not foundation for argument. They are examples of how idiots come to a conclusion, then find "evidence" to back up their conclusion... rather than basing conclusions on evidence.
I'm sure that was way above most of your heads... I'll go back to work now.
|
LOL... Fuck, another AlienQ-style genius... Maybe we should just get rid of the word "insinuated" because when you think of it, "its simply your take on the words," ..."he didn't actually say that, you are putting words in his mouth." haha no shit, what do you think insinuated means?
That's what Beck says:
"AL-Queda would like to destroy us and will work with anyone,
9/11 Truthers would like to destroy us also and will work with anyone"
"9/11 truthers love von Brunn because he took action" (terrorist-like action)
Intelligent people can actually spot obvious insinuations by using basic logic... Dumber people feel that if the person didnt actually said something explicitly, then any interpretations becomes speculation and therefore irrelevent... in other words, it's just to damn complicated!