Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
in regards to this though, not sure why everyone is hating on AIM, they are just a clinic, just abusiness, like thousands of other clinics in LA.
Youll never find a "better" solution, when models have test in hand for a shoot, then fuck someone off camera without testing.
Blaming AIM for not releaseing private records is silly when the risk behavior falls on talent, nothing to do with AIM at all
As ive said before, I know some talent as friends, and have p[artied with them and know at the end of the night, they have test in hand for shoot, then go out at night and fuck unprotected untested guy, then shot up for shoot next day, you cant blame AIM for that.
|
No you can't just blame AIM, I agree with that 100%. Models are often reckless and there is no stopping that. However, where I think AIM is wrong is trying to hide information. If industry people test positive for HIV, then the industry needs to know. It's that simple. If I was working in LA at the moment, I would be livid.
You are also correct when you say there is no solution. There never will be, short of condom use industry wide.
In reality, I don't work in LA and work in Asia and South America, so I honestly don't give a fuck. I'm just wasting time here when I should be working. I've had more models in Thailand test HIV+ in a year than all of LA has in the history of the business. So no big deal really. People should know that if they want to play grown up games, there are grown up consequences, though that brings me to another problem with AIM, and that is they give a false sense of security with their testing. At least I believe they do. I know countless performers in the USA who believe balls to bones that if they are AIM tested, they are totally safe. Foolish to think, and perhaps that is the type of person our industry attracts, but I do feel AIM should be a little more realistic and make it painfully aware there are still serious health risks involved.