|
**If** this was (big on the IF here) a controlled demolition - which would lead to further questions and implications about the attacks on the twin towers themselves...how could those responsible think they could get away with an obvious controlled demolition in front of tens of thousands of witnesses?
Yes, to me it does look like it *could* have been a controlled demolition the way the building came down - however, the logical side of me wonders how they thought they could get away with it in this era of so many cameras everywhere (especially since there would have been far more cameras already present subsequent to the attacks on the towers).
Without doubt the Bush administration was a corrupt (and inept) entity on many, many levels - but were they corrupt enough to mastermind something as sinister and outrageous as a massive attack on their own citizens in full public view - for whatever agenda?
|