Quote:
Originally Posted by dready
The difference is that this is 100% web based using Java. You could potentially create a tube site with its own tracker that looks and feels like any other, but you're not paying the nearly the same bandwidth bill.
|
hell you could even distribute dvd quality streams at a fraction of the cost of a traditional tube site
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gambrinus
A tube site that depended on seeders, imagine the sheer level of suck.
|
why you would just web seed the file
which means at it worst (1 person watching) it would be no more costly then a current tube site.
If x people are watching it at the same time, then you would split the file into x pieces and let them share it amoung themselves. The end result is bandwidth cost would be capped at 1 download irregardless of how many people were streaming the video.