View Single Post
Old 04-29-2009, 01:14 PM  
lazycash
Troll Patrol
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Local Socal
Posts: 15,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveHardeman View Post
The OP is dismayed that the videos he's using to promote Disgraced18.com with are watermarked with humiliated.com, right?

I would think this would be detrimental to BOTH the affiliate AND the sponsor. The affiliates problem is obvious.

In addition, I would think that a surfer would see that and think to himself that what he's watching is just an old scene from an old site that they're now rehashing on a new site. Don't know if that's true or not but perception is reality. I'm just saying, if I have my surfer hat on, that's what I'd be thinking and then I'd move on to the next gallery/video/whatever. Thus, losing money for both the affiliate and the sponsor.

Then, I'd just go to a tube and whack it for days. :-)
The watermarked url is also owned by the sponsor so its definitely not detrimental to them. Its technically an indirect traffic leak and I can see how some affiliates might not like it, but there's so many more blatant sponsor tricks going on than this.
__________________
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..

Its crazy..."

VenusBlogger
lazycash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote