Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveHardeman
The OP is dismayed that the videos he's using to promote Disgraced18.com with are watermarked with humiliated.com, right?
I would think this would be detrimental to BOTH the affiliate AND the sponsor. The affiliates problem is obvious.
In addition, I would think that a surfer would see that and think to himself that what he's watching is just an old scene from an old site that they're now rehashing on a new site. Don't know if that's true or not but perception is reality. I'm just saying, if I have my surfer hat on, that's what I'd be thinking and then I'd move on to the next gallery/video/whatever. Thus, losing money for both the affiliate and the sponsor.
Then, I'd just go to a tube and whack it for days. :-)
|
The watermarked url is also owned by the sponsor so its definitely not detrimental to them. Its technically an indirect traffic leak and I can see how some affiliates might not like it, but there's so many more blatant sponsor tricks going on than this.
__________________
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Its crazy..."
VenusBlogger