View Single Post
Old 04-04-2009, 09:05 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Let's just say you make it 100% impossible to run a Tube site with content not owned by the Tube site owner.
That's the question and this is the problem.

While Tubes make a profit they will exist and the harder you make it for some, the better it is for those who get past those obstacles.

So let's imagine it's totally impossible to run a site with content you don't own. Yes I know it's a dream but not as much as us all streaming our content.

This is what would happen. The sites that own Tubes will put their content onto their Tube sites. Plus Tube sites will become more profitable to run, less of them with full length scenes means more surfers on them looking at the adverts.

So maybe some sponsors might decide the days of struggling to get affiliates to send them traffic that costs a fortune will decide to turn their paysites into Tube sites with adverts.

This is without all the sponsors who are prepared to give legal Tubes 4, 5, 6 or what ever length clips to Tube sites. Sometimes even hosting them as well. Yes the sponsors today pay the BW bill for a Tube to sell dating and web cam adverts. It's so fucking ridiculous I would never of dreamed it would happen. But it does.

So please DirtyWhiteBoy stop telling us about streaming, it's a dead end solution.

The only way to bring Tubes down is to make them unprofitable.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote