Quote:
Originally Posted by pinupglam
To be quite blunt, this argument is racist. Pit Bulls are used as attack/fighting dogs not because they are naturally aggressive, but because they are probably the most trainable dog breed there is. They also look tough, so the bottom-feeder element of our society has adopted this breed as its dog of choice in order to promote the thug/gangsta lifestyle they employ. These dogs are trained by this element of society to fight, be aggressive, attack, etc. and I certainly wouldn't recommend that anyone take a fighting dog into their home and have it around their kids. But the bottom line is that the vast majority of pits out there never attack anyone and are amazingly loving and loyal dogs.
There's probably 10 million of them out there and we have a couple hundred attacks a year, so therefore the entire breed is bad? Right. I suppose that since blacks commit seven times more violent crime in this country than whites, therefore all black people must be dangerous and avoided and banned from entire cities, right?
Get the facts, people... don't just cherry pick sensationalistic news stories and base your entire opinions on them.
|
what you are saying is total crap. they are used as attack/fighting dogs because that's what they've been bred for. lol to say it's becuase they're the most trainable dog is laughable. if fighting dogs were chosen because of trainability they would all be border collies or something similar, not a relatively unintelligent terrier. they're chosen/bred because of thier jaw strength, strength, stamina, pain threshold etc but intelligence doesn't come into it.