Quote:
Originally Posted by ahoy
Haha, I believe that is what he is getting at. Let me see if we can put this in some statistical terms where he might realize his argument is retarded.
(fake numbers)
top 3 aggressive dogs kill 30 people a year
the 3 dogs after that kill only 10 people a year
You eliminate the top 3, and now there is only 10 deaths a year by the "new" top 3 and 30 people are now saved!
Smokey, maybe I am not understanding what you are trying to get it.. but does this help you understand why your argument just makes no fucking sense?
|
no your theory is flawed , all the people that had pitbulls would now have other breeds. ( forgot about that didnt ya
)
let me explain to you like i did to franck why your stats theory makes no sense
lets say top 3 colors of cars kill 3000 people per year the 3 colors after that kill only 500 , by your math if we remove the top 3 colors of cars we will save 2500 people every year from dying..
do you really think that would happen or do you think idiots would buy another colour