Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

stats are fucked when you look at them like that. Lets just imagine we had a button to eliminate the 3 breeds he mentions.

Now lets redo the same stats you just mentioned, suprise suprise there would be 3 new breeds of dogs up there..

and if you eliminated those 3 breeds there would be 3 new breeds at the top of the list.
and so on and so on until there are no dogs left.





i have my doubts about this guy, he is claiming if other dogs "go bad" you will "not" be killed, thats just plain false, as it has and does happen.




i dont know what this guy is smoking but how did he come to that conclusion

Its very rare to be killed or maimed by a dog especially a pitbull , so "often" is probably a silly word to use.




if you gave 100 labradors to crack dealers, then gave 100 pitbulls to ballerina's, then took stats 50 years later, i guarantee you the labs would be far more dangerous statistically, all these "stats" are useless if you look at the problem so vaguely