Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies
So once again, you are blown out of the water.
Counter suit, to get re-included, means you removed the material.
I went ahead and underlined that for you, even though it is mentioned three times. Maybe you will actually READ it this time.
 |
my god you have the reading and compenhension level of a 5 year old.
Quote:
|
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good faith belief that each search result, message, or other item of content identified above was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled
|
this is what you do when you want to claim that the removal request is wrong
sort of exactly what lenz did in the lenz vs univeral case.
the second part (after the or) is the part you do if you backed down like a little bitch.
your absurd reading of the quote would mean they would have to remove the content EVEN if you had a fair use right to publish which would have resulted in a automagic win for universal. Guess what they lost that one.