|
some of those teeth don't appear to be very well cared-for in the first place.
if it is in fact poison, and does no good unless directly applied (other than the similarity of drinking the water to using mouthwash), then:
a) why has the overall dental health improved over the past several years since it's accepted in the drinking water, and why would country schools to a weekly flouride treatment for student to make up for the lack of flouride?
b) why haven't more people had problems due to the toxicity of flouride in our drinking water?
i am curious. i've heard some debate over the alleged flouride conspiracy, and i do realize that flouride can be very dangerous, but never anything substantial enough to prove it to me.
also, i don't belive i'd blame the US' obesity problem on flouride, i'd accredit that to laziness.
|