Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies
Quit while you're behind.
1. You have no idea who I do, and do not, do business with.
2. Most do not have affiliate programs.
3. My license restricts use, and I know which programs are licensed to use content, and how.
This include the domain(s) they are licensed to use to promote material on, and which are authorized to USE the material according to the license. How and where material can be used.
For simple minded gideon's sake, I'll provide a real life legal example. Tube sites are not allowed according to the license. So I see a full length clip on ANY tube, I know there is no license permitting that.
|
except for that tricky fair use thing that automagically authorizes it use for such activity as timeshifting, backup and hopefully in the future access shifting.
Quote:
|
Any DMCA is legal. Should any affiliate or program use clips in such a manner would be breaking the license, making it null and void.
|
again you can't licience way fair use if they could
counter suits like this one would not happen
http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=3777651
http://www.eff.org/cases/lenz-v-universal
and before you do the bullshit, sampling is obviously fair use, timeshifting isn't real dance you always do. The fact is there is no ladder of fair use, each is equally valid and has to be considered equally.
Quote:
While that is one of countless examples to blow gideon's hypotheticals out of the water. One is enough. We, as do many content providers, have licenses and limits to how content can be used. It is spelled out clearly urls, and uses, or limitations.
Now, once you are finished talking out of your ass, and making up hypotheticals that do not apply to any mistakes I am not going to be making in the future thanks to a license, good record keeping, and restrictions.....
carry on with your usual stirring up bullshit shtick.
|
the irony is the more effective you prove this policy is
the more reason that the tubes would have to fight back.
if everyone dmca a site out of google then they would have no choice but to start counter suing to keep their listings.
Funny thing is counter claim notice is only 1 page long too, send that in and the list has to be put back.
The only way you could deal with it then is to go to court and prove that the fair use right justification is bogus.
I am sure the judge would love your ni gg a please arguement
