Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
What fact of mine is twisted? Bush did spend more, he is only trying to ban high powered guns, bush created the mess we are in with all that he did, none of this is in question by anyone but you.
I know where Criminals get guns from.. They steal them from people like my Dad who buys them in Guns Stores. ~ Fact
A home owner having a HAND GUN - is not in question here. Those are legal, he isn't trying to ban them, regulate those, stop those or anything. Actually - It "PROVES" that we don't need ak47's at all in this Country - a handgun is MORE THAN ENOUGH PROTECTION.
Clinton didn't do this, and the Dot Com thing which a major success for our Country. The fact of deregulation through the Republicans is what allowed this Countries to 'ake the books.
|
while I agree with you that handguns are great for protection I never miss with mine... I disagree in the fact of what I can and can't own as far as guns go... id like to see em come get my m107... you saying thats too much for a "civilian" to own?
sometimes you need bigger guns to get bigger jobs done....
as for criminals the ban does nothing to stop criminals.. if they are intent on hurting you they will do it with a wrench...
you carry a nice emblem in your avitar so im assuming you know as well as I do that someone with training can over take an ak with no weapon... thats not the question at hand... it's the fact the gov is not here to tell me what I can and can't own... just like the bush admin should not tell adults what they can and can't watch.....