Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyDanza
your facts are twisted brother.... they are not facts...
as for the 4 with ak's isint that the one where the homeowner was able to get in and return fire and made them flee? so he was able to protect himself from the bad guys right? +1 for the gun owners... so banning the sale of some of these guns would be like someone saying well we have this medicine that can save your life but we can't sell it to you....
you think criminals get guns from gun stores?
the only thing you got right in your post was the fact that the market should have never grown to this level it was a false level... which happend under clinton back in the "dot com" craze.. I remember waking up one morning and seeing quallcom at like 600 bucks per share....
|
What fact of mine is twisted? Bush did spend more, he is only trying to ban high powered guns, bush created the mess we are in with all that he did, none of this is in question by anyone but you.
I know where Criminals get guns from.. They steal them from people like my Dad who buys them in Guns Stores. ~ Fact
A home owner having a HAND GUN - is not in question here. Those are legal, he isn't trying to ban them, regulate those, stop those or anything. Actually - It "PROVES" that we don't need ak47's at all in this Country - a handgun is MORE THAN ENOUGH PROTECTION.
Clinton didn't do this, and the Dot Com thing which a major success for our Country. The fact of deregulation through the Republicans is what allowed this Countries to 'ake the books.