|
One might cry 'foul' when a country tries to invade another with way superior weapons. There is no other way for those people to fight but breaking rules. They simply state that the guy who got prisoner had no business to be there in the first place. Do you really expect those people to feed the prisoners when the US and the UN made sure they have nothing to eat themselves? I seriously doubt that.
Don't get me wrong here. I think that treating war prisoners in a good way is the right thing but I think it is the US that claims war prisoners as terrorists and hold them in a foreign country without any way to defend themselves. I think it is the US that does not honor the international Court and even Bush said that he would get any American out by force if one ever get in front of that court that is exactly there for punishing war crimes. I think crying foul is ok but it has a very bad taste when it comes from the US.
|