Quote:
Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter
i was not aware of this, but why is important for you to mention? most likely in DC people (jurors) are much more "urban" and can distinguish between obscenity and freedom of speech. i doubt he would be found guilty by a juror but if he is, then the DOJ will have succeeded in "scaring" most pornographers away from producing/distributing as no one will feel "safe"...
|
you stated that i was dumb enough to not see that
Quote:
|
there is reason the content was shipped to a county in florida,... had they had this court trial in almost any other county max could easily have walked away from it..
|
yet the DOJ is trying another obscenity case elsewhere, disproving your comments- and assumptions. if the DOJ had a slam dunk attitude about obscenity trials and winning them in FL, then the stagliano case would also be tried there, it's not and it's again presumptous of you to assume what jurors in D.C. will decide as well.