Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
And I will disagree with you.
Clear cut rules can easily be fought and have shit stopped before you loose every penny you own fighting it. Vague ones just allow them to fuck with you for as long as they wish.
|
We agree on something.
Clearly defined rules are easy to stay within and if you cross them you know the risks. Also banning sites that cross those lines is also a good thing to protect those who stay on the right side of the law. The US does what China does and blocks the domain, the financial pressure will force people to conform or lose the US market.
Also unless you stop men from jerking off there will always be a porn business. When the line was drawn at exposed nipples guys jerked off to that. When it was redrawn it was moved up. You don't need to show extreme porn to get a guy to buy material to jerk off. If this were not true Playboy would never had sold. This can apply to the Playboy end of the market and the Amateur end.
As for Paul Little. I met him in a shooting environment in the early 90s and long before he could do what he was doing 10 years later on film. I also spoke to him and models who worked for him. He did not do what he did for free speech or profit. IMO he did it because he likes abusing girls. He is no champion for free speech.